Agreed. It seems that the problem of curbing this obvious growing fascist movement could best be served by the enforcement of existing laws. I mean the vigorous and aggressive enforcement of laws that prevent slander, libel, incitement to violence, harassment, threats, assault, battery, intimidation, abuse, vandalism, etc. Of course, the…
Agreed. It seems that the problem of curbing this obvious growing fascist movement could best be served by the enforcement of existing laws. I mean the vigorous and aggressive enforcement of laws that prevent slander, libel, incitement to violence, harassment, threats, assault, battery, intimidation, abuse, vandalism, etc. Of course, the greater problem lies with the collusion of policing and judicial members refusing to enforce said laws. THAT creates a serious crisis for a civil society. When existing laws are not enforced the "law of the jungle" takes over. Censuring speech, that is not in violation of existing laws, only fuels the agendas of those wanting to falsely claim that they are the victims.
Agreed. It seems that the problem of curbing this obvious growing fascist movement could best be served by the enforcement of existing laws. I mean the vigorous and aggressive enforcement of laws that prevent slander, libel, incitement to violence, harassment, threats, assault, battery, intimidation, abuse, vandalism, etc. Of course, the greater problem lies with the collusion of policing and judicial members refusing to enforce said laws. THAT creates a serious crisis for a civil society. When existing laws are not enforced the "law of the jungle" takes over. Censuring speech, that is not in violation of existing laws, only fuels the agendas of those wanting to falsely claim that they are the victims.