5 Comments

I live in Sonoma County and I have been following this issue for some time. Usually, our county is fairly progressive on issues such as the environment and animal welfare. I grew up on a farm in PA where we, among other things, raised chickens. Seeing the videos makes me sick. When the evens happened, the local press seemed to make light of the protesters; they were somehow "radicals." After giving this much thought, I have come to the conclusion that "money talks." The farmers raising the chickens and the manufacturers seem to have inordinate power. These farms and processing plants employ many workers. And I think the constant painting these protesters as "radicals" has made an impact on the public. It is my hope that when this does go to trial, the jury will see the TRUTH. I am NOT a radical "animal rights" person; they HAVE done things I don't agree with across the country. However, I just want animals raised for food to be treated humanely. Let the people SEE the evidence. I hope a jury agrees.

Expand full comment

I so much agree with you: When we rescued Oliver from horrifying conditions at a dog meat farm in Yulin, China, the US government supported us and national media applauded us as heroes. Why should things be different for a chicken or pig?

Expand full comment

Hopefully the rescuers will be supported and the public can see the truth of what occurs in the so called humane organic poultry producer!

Expand full comment

hey Wayne. great article, as always.

*one friendly note. you write that ā€œindustry standards donā€™t define the law.ā€ from my understanding, they actually doā€¦ ā€œFarmingā€ practices deemed ā€œnecessaryā€ are exempted from every stateā€™s animal cruelty statutes, and ā€œnecessaryā€ has in turn been partly defined as whatever are considered ā€œCustomary Farming Practices,ā€ i.e., practices that are common across the industry. Thus, industry standards do quite literally define US law. David Wolfson and Mariann Sullivanā€™s article, ā€œFoxes in the Hen House,ā€ is the best read iā€™ve seen on the topic.

As a sidetone, this US standard has been cited abroad to justify the same exemptions (e.g., ā€œOne tendency, dominant in the USA and Canada, exempts established agricultural practices from the applicability of animal protection laws.ā€ HCJ 9232/01 Noah v. Attā€™y Gen. [2003] IsrSC 215, 231.)

thanks for writing these,

-n

Expand full comment

Perhaps prime time public service announcementā€™s to enlighten consumers

Expand full comment
Error